| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Dell Precision T1650 |
| Motherboard | Dell Precision T1650 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20180628 |
| Uptime | 14.9 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 04 '22 at 12:41 |
| Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
| Run User | SVK-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.2%
Very good
|
69% 118 Pts
|
47% 350 Pts
|
20% 331 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro P600
HP(103C 11BD) 2GB
CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
|
16.4%
Very poor
|
17% 19 fps
|
15% 19 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1,007% 4,529 MB/s
|
1,043% 278 MB/s
|
609% 809 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
400GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 102 102 102 MB/s
|
59.4%
Above average
|
71% 96.4 MB/s
|
178% 1.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
50.6%
Above average
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
54% 73.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 948 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 308x |
| Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples | 147x |
| Xeon E3-1270 V2IntelBench 73%, 3,610 samples | 101x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 81x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 73x |
| Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 63x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $384 |