Asus B85M-G

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-G (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150722
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '17 at 00:57
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3220-$36 19,337 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 86.9 1-Core 82.8 2-Core 158 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 159 21% 159 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% EVGA(3842 1563) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1053 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.69 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Lighting 21.1 Reflection 24.7 Parallax 19.3 17% 21.7 fps	MRender 1.38 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84 21,990 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 153 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 96 (A5) Unknown 100 100 283484291300 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 8 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 16 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 54 51 210453397550 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 326420856908 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 420 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1046 (F1) Unknown 253 253 585 (F2) Unknown 253 253 478 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	48.2% Average	Read 472 Write 98.5 Mixed 112 49% 228 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 2.7 64% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 6.55 38% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 71%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 52 (03) Spinup time 168 165 6583 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2357 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8055 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2281 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 122 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 164 164 108989 (C2) HDA temperature 115 99 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 183 51 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	62.3% Good	Read 106 Write 111 Mixed 6.31 53% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.2 94% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 67%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB 9,045 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 134GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 135 133 6225 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 970 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8392 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 434 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 40 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 970 (C2) HDA temperature 111 94 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	43.5% Average	Read 73.9 Write 77.3 Mixed 33.3 45% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.31 89% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 28,220 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.2% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.83 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 8.7 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	959x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	786x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	532x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	481x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	402x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	368x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	259x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	163x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	153x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	156x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	126x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $317

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16