TEST
YOUR HDD
ADD TO PC
BUILD

WD WD20EARX

Green 2TB (2011)

▲ 52400 ▼

Release date: Q2 2011.

Average Bench: 50.9% (289th of 1015)

more Based on 212,471 user benchmarks.  Models: WDC WD20EARX-00PASB0, WDC WD20EARS-42R6B0, WDC WD20 EARS-11J99B1, WDC WD20 EARS-11J2GB0, WDC WD20EARS-67S8B1, WDC WD20EARS-11J2GB0, WDC WD20EARX-00PASB, WDC WD20EARX-00Z, WDC WD20EARS-19MVWB0, WDC WD20EARS-42R6B5, WDC WD20EARX-60PASB0, WDC WD20 EARX-55PASB0, WDC WD20EARS-11J99B1, WDC WD20 EARS-19MVWB0, WDC WD20EARS-55M, WDC WD20EARX-55PASB0, WDC WD20EARS-55MVWB0, WDC WD20EARX-008FB0, WDC WD20EARS-00S0XB0, WDC WD20 EARS-42S0XB0, WDC WD20EARS-60M, WDC WD20EARS-22MVWB0, WDC WD20EARX-07PASB0, WDC WD20EARS-98MVWB0, WDC WD20 EARS-55MVWB0, WDC WD20 EARX-00P, WDC WD20EARX-55P, WDC WD20 EARX-328FB0, WDC WD20 EARX-19PASB0, WDC WD20 EARS-07MVWB0, WDC WD20 EARS-00U2B0, WDC WD20EARS-00J99B0, WDC WD20EARS-00J2GB0, WDC WD20 EARS-42R6B0, WDC WD20EARS-14M, WDC WD20EARX-32P, WDC WD20EARS-00CLWB0, WDC WD20EARX-328, WDC WD20EARS-00S8B1, WDC WD20 EARS-14MVWB0, WDC WD20EARS-00MVWB, WDC WD20EARS-42S, WDC WD20 EARX-00MMMB0, WD20EARX-00PASB0, WDC WD20 EARX-07PASB0, WDC WD20EARS-00MVWB0, WDC WD20EARX-328FB0, WDC WD20EARS-00MVWB1, WDC WD20EARS-00U0AB0, WDC WD20 EARS-00M, WDC WD20EARS-07M, WDC WD20EARS-14MVWB0, WDC WD20EARS-19M, WD20EARX-00PASB, WDC WD20 EARS-60MVWB0, WDC WD20 EARX-32PASB0, WDC WD20EARX-22AVNB0, WDC WD20EARS-00R6B0, WDC WD20EARS-00J, WD20EARS-00MVWB0, WDC WD20 EARX-008FB0, WDC WD20EARX-22P, WDC WD20EARX-00ZUDB0, WDC WD20EARX-00MVWBO, WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0, WDC WD20EARS-00S, WDC WD20EARX-00MMMB0, WDC WD20EARS-00U, WDC WD20 EARX-00AZ6B0, WD20EARS-00MVWB, WD20EARS-00S8B1, WDC WD20EARS-00U2B0, WDC WD20EARX-07P, WDC WD20EARX-19P, WDC WD20 EARS-00J99B0, WDC WD20 EARX-22PASB0, WDC WD20 EARX-00ZUDB0, WD20EARX-00D8PB0, WDC WD20EARX-22PASB0, WDC WD20 EARS-00J2GB0, WDC WD20 EARX-60PASB0, WDC WD20EARX-00M, WDC WD20EARX-32PASB0, WDC WD20EARS-07MVWB0, WDC WD20EARX-00P, WD WD20EARX-00PASB0, WDC WD20EARX-19PASB0, WDC WD20EARX-00PASBO, WDC WD20EARX-008, WDC WD20 EARS-22MVWB0, WDC WD20EARS-00S2B0, WDC WD20 EARS-00S0XB0, WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB1, WDC WD20EARS-42S0XB0, WDC WD20EARS-67MVWB0, WD20E-Niotis, WDC WD20EARX-00A, WDC WD20 EARS-67S8B1, WDC WD20EARX-00AZ6B0, WDC WD20EARS-22M

The Western Digital Green (EARX) was released approximately three years ago and proved to be an extremely popular hard drive. This drive has been benchmarked by our users far more than most, currently 118 samples, so we have a relatively large set of performance data from which we can infer robust performance characteristics. With sequential read/write Lab speeds hitting the 150 MB/s mark, and more importantly, average read/write UserBenchMark (UBM) figures of 125/117 MB/s the 2011 WD Green is no longer able to compete with the newer and in many cases larger platter (1TB) drives of today. Looking at a direct comparison between the EARX and, its direct successor, the EZRX shows that the newer 2012 EZRX outperforms by around 37% in real world tests and 18% in peak Lab tests. This additional performance comes at no extra cost and makes the newer EZRX a far better choice. [Jan '14 HDrivePro]

Poor: 31%Average: 50.9% Great: 67%

Popular builds with this HDD

Average average bench

The WD Green 2TB (2011) averaged 49.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed 0.61MB/s
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed 0.75MB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the WD Green 2TB (2011) is 36.2%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the WD Green 2TB (2011) performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed 66.7MB/s
Avg. Sequential Write Speed 85MB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 212,471 samples)
Rank 28950.9%
Min Avg Max
49.4 Read 90.5 123
42 Write 85 113
27.8 Mixed 66.7 98.7
47.9 SusWrite 86.6 116
60.7% 82.2 MB/s
Min Avg Max
0.5 4K Read 0.75 1
0.4 4K Write 1.63 2.4
0.3 4K Mixed 0.61 0.8
129% 1 MB/s
User Benchmarks BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
The fastest HDD (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
383GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 104 106 106 104 MB/s
60.8% Good
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 106
68% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.53 MB/s
13GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 64 65 64 64 MB/s
48.5% Average
Read 105
Write 95.2
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 63.2
66% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
765GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 65 65 65 MB/s
45.1% Average
Read 91.7
Write 94.2
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 64.9
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.27 MB/s
416GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 42 40 35 41 39 MB/s
40% Below average
Read 100
Write 32.7
Mixed 40
SusWrite 39.2
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.73 MB/s
212,471 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 53,603,032 HDDs tested

 Prices

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

MSRP ≈ $98 @ launch in Apr '11
EbayUS $602 mins
AmazonUS $7814 mins
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Green 2TB (2011) Builds (Compare 23,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $80Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples5,097x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples3,240x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $176Bench 86%, 635,419 samples3,010x
GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia  $234Bench 90%, 645,160 samples1,535x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $275Bench 115%, 663,603 samples1,342x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $460Bench 148%, 619,642 samples1,332x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples906x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples799x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples698x
RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples1,578x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples1,548x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples966x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $589

Popular Green 2TB (2011) compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your HDD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Hard Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 HDD Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top HDDs. [HDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

HDrivePro
Avatar level
1,391

Official site www.wdc.com/...

Meeting technological challenges...

Added 10 years ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
9,918

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

3 years ago.

DEU-User
Avatar level
5,793

Good

4 years ago.

have an older Seagate, which still has its power. The WD donegend shaft barely 54 mb / s.

RUS-User
Avatar level
4,804

Terrible

5 years ago.

two HDD green series dead, all my data lost

HDrivePro
Avatar level
1,391

Terrible

10 years ago.

evander321
Avatar level
50

Good

2 years ago.

Its not that fast compared to some of the newer drives, but i guess it's still usable. I guess it could be a backup or a gaming hdd if you dont mind the longer loading times. It's pretty quiet for being an hdd and cheap on the used market.

JetpackTurtle
Avatar level
30

Excellent

4 years ago.

60,000 power on hours, been in 4 computers, dropped, abused, and used and not even a single hiccup. Still gets 70+ MB/s and holds most of my games. Well done.

rschmidt
Avatar level
16

Good

3 years ago.

Okay

PaulBags
Avatar level
8

Average

7 years ago.

Getting old in the tooth, it still performs well as a storage drive.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 13 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)
vs WD Blue 1TB (2012)
vs Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)
vs Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)
vs Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB
vs WD Black 1TB (2013)
vs Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)
vs WD Black 2TB (2013)
vs Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB

1015 Drives (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different HDDs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Storage Devices FAQ
What is sustained sequential write speed?
What’s the difference between SLC, MLC and TLC?
What is 3D XPoint and how fast is it?
What’s the difference between SATA, PCIe and NVMe?
What’s the difference between NAND and V-NAND?
What is sequential write speed?
What is sequential read speed?
What is incompressible data?
What is queue depth?
What is 4K random write speed?
What is 4K random read speed?
What is AS SSD real world copy speed?
How big is 16GB?
What does MBps mean?
Hard Drives
What is the Hard Drive value for money rating?
What is effective Hard Drive speed?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback