Sony VPCZ13V9E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSony VPCZ13V9E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '22 at 23:20
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 M 640
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 56.8
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 124
50% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 163
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MMCRE28GQDXP-MVB 64GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM44S1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 19 14 13 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.1% Poor
Read 70.7
Write 30.2
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 15.8
33% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.5
377% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 50%
Samsung MMCRE28GQDXP-MVB 64GB
59GB free
Firmware: VBM44S1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 57 38 33 39 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35% Below average
Read 77.5
Write 59.2
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 43.1
47% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 2.8
460% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 10.1
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback