| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP xw6400 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A04h |
| Memory | 13 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090709 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 16 '22 at 18:38 |
| Run Duration | 191 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon 5160
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
40.4%
Average
|
40% 61.8 Pts
|
10% 77.2 Pts
|
5% 77.4 Pts
|
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
95GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 5.5 7.8 109 193 184 MB/s
|
44.5%
Average
|
38% 166 MB/s
|
95% 30.4 MB/s
|
32% 42.6 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 3.4 4.1 27 49 47 MB/s
|
20.3%
Poor
|
31% 41.8 MB/s
|
101% 0.73 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$35
422GB free
Firmware: SD26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 3.3 4.4 27 50 48 MB/s
|
30.5%
Below average
|
47% 63.6 MB/s
|
102% 0.63 MB/s
| |
|
JMicron Tech 240GB
116GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 2.2 3.2 25 39 33 MB/s
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
57% 43.9 MB/s
|
108% 1.5 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 4GB-$15
4GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.2 4 4.2 4.4 4.3 MB/s
|
2.86%
Terrible
|
9% 7.38 MB/s
|
5% 0.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
14.4%
Very poor
|
12% 4.23 GB/s
|
12% 4.27 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical xw6400 Workstation Builds (Compare 50 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP xw6400 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples | 15x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples | 10x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 235 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 6x |
| Quadro FX 4600NvidiaBench 4%, 1,222 samples | 3x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |