Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 108% UFO	Workstation 90% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	76.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4 (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 05 '22 at 19:54
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	91%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-12600KF-$155 40,032 User benchmarks, average bench 109% LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Memory 92 1-Core 196 2-Core 396 120% 228 Pts	4-Core 726 8-Core 1,264 120% 995 Pts	64-Core 1,803 112% 1,803 Pts
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 117%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.9% Very good	Lighting 98.2 Reflection 138 Parallax 88.8 80% 108 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 89 Splatting 76 71% 88.3 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: MX4OAC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 129 141 146 148 155 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 145 Write 174 Mixed 35.9 SusWrite 143 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 108%
VendorCo ProductCode 537GB 260 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 28GB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 6 6.1 6 6 6 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	5.38% Terrible	Read 21.7 Write 5.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 5.7 10% 9.33 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 14% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.38% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 12,409 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	MC Read 41.1 MC Write 41.1 MC Mixed 38.4 115% 40.2 GB/s	SC Read 28.2 SC Write 43.7 SC Mixed 33.8 101% 35.2 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 3,898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

CPU
Core i5-12400FIntel $133Bench 98%, 48,886 samples	764x
Core i5-12400Intel $162Bench 98%, 17,352 samples	602x
Core i5-12600KIntel $178Bench 109%, 101,563 samples	547x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	525x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	439x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $499Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	333x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	221x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	179x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	161x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 91%, 43,162 samples	186x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	178x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $506

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16