Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 22:23
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Memory 70.1
1-Core 173
2-Core 350
102% 198 Pts
4-Core 685
8-Core 1,315
119% 1,000 Pts
64-Core 2,842
176% 2,842 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 174
Parallax 183
157% 183 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 137
Splatting 114
115% 145 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 134%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 742 393 162 158 161 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,409
Write 1,396
Mixed 1,205
SusWrite 296
241% 1,077 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 66.5
225% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1201
DQ Write 928
DQ Mixed 963
748% 1,031 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 192%
Great: 237%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$247
241GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 275 225 251 266 284 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 366
Write 346
Mixed 324
SusWrite 256
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 29.9
106% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 154
116% 157 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 133%
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Plus 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: R4PB47.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4048 4622 4384 4407 4627 4233 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
525% Outstanding
Read 2,477
Write 4,292
Mixed 2,988
SusWrite 4,387
805% 3536 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 96.9
333% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,408
DQ Write 1,066
DQ Mixed 1,334
971% 1,269 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 525%
Great: 593%
Hitachi G-DRIVE with Thu 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 1.8 23 21 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 57.4
Write 9
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 16.1
17% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21%
Great: 122%
Generic- SD Card 128GB
108GB free, PID 0306
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 79 75 79 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
41% Average
Read 84.6
Write 73
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 79
95% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 4
270% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.5% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 24.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 21.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,184
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback