Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory41.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1728 x 994 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220216
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 02 '22 at 01:46
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 74.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 1,048
95% 802 Pts
64-Core 2,107
130% 2,107 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$899
Asus(1043 8822) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 285
Reflection 239
Parallax 290
232% 271 fps
MRender 311
Gravity 235
Splatting 172
188% 239 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 194%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 305 252 294 368 348 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 180
Mixed 222
SusWrite 312
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 41
147% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 177
142% 200 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
663GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 442 447 442 432 416 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 439
Mixed 441
SusWrite 438
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 52.6
173% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 219
165% 221 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
190GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 442 447 442 433 416 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 430
Mixed 390
SusWrite 438
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 56
180% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 219
165% 221 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
46GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 354 225 220 209 210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 437
Mixed 423
SusWrite 277
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 53.7
179% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 201
156% 214 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
324GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 443 447 442 432 416 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 438
Mixed 414
SusWrite 438
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 53.8
180% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 218
164% 221 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Seagate ST2000DM009-2G4100 2TB
889GB free
Firmware: DN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 150 150 149 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 162
Write 150
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 149
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
240% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
396GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 117 120 117 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 81.5
Write 122
Mixed 108
SusWrite 116
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.7
380% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 94%
WD My Book 25DB 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 25db
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 144 150 156 162 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 150
Write 151
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 154
180% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%
WD My Book 1230 6TB
485GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 93 92 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 84.5
Write 89.5
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 93.3
114% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 30.8
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 29.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,593
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback