| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock Z270M Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180118 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 15 '22 at 11:11 |
| Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.9%
Very good
|
81% 144 Pts
|
54% 411 Pts
|
28% 447 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.2%
Above average
|
54% 69.3 fps
|
55% 67.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 180 103 86 82 99 MB/s
|
63.8%
Good
|
55% 249 MB/s
|
100% 37.5 MB/s
|
109% 166 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT02ABA200 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: KP000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 177 178 177 179 180 MB/s
|
20.9%
Poor
|
35% 156 MB/s
|
7% 3.37 MB/s
|
2% 3.47 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
443GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 120 119 119 122 MB/s
|
52.2%
Above average
|
56% 75.8 MB/s
|
116% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905702-010.A00G KHX2400C15/8G 16GB
2800, 2800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
85.7%
Excellent
|
87% 30.6 GB/s
|
75% 26.3 GB/s
|
56% 71.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z270M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 225 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Extreme4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 73x |
| Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 50x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 23x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 26x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 21x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 19x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $673 |