Acer, Aspire 5050

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer, Aspire 5050  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer, Prespa M
Memory1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20061012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '17 at 00:15
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64 Mobile Technology MK-36
Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Memory 62
1-Core 29.6
2-Core 28.8
31% 40.1 Pts
4-Core 29.2
8-Core 28.9
4% 29 Pts
64-Core 29
2% 29 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541680J9AT00 80GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SB2OA70H Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 42.7
Write 41.2
Mixed 7.32
22% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.24
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 24%
Verbatim Store 'n' Go 2GB
1GB free, PID 2005
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 6.47
Mixed 6.48
11% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.91
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.02
16% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback