Performance Results


Gaming 108% UFO	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C37
Motherboard	MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) (all builds)
Memory	18.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210622
Uptime	6.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '22 at 00:24
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 63.9 1-Core 120 2-Core 250 77% 145 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 708 74% 593 Pts	64-Core 1,025 63% 1,025 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% MSI(1462 3909) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	142% Outstanding	Lighting 205 Reflection 194 Parallax 188 167% 196 fps	MRender 182 Gravity 144 Splatting 130 122% 152 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 78 49 40 44 10 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.9% Poor	Read 229 Write 208 Mixed 215 SusWrite 58.5 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 7.2 40% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 9.5 DQ Write 51.3 DQ Mixed 33.7 25% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 55%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 859 1097 1171 1218 1400 1286 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	253% Outstanding	Read 1,821 Write 1,077 Mixed 1,480 SusWrite 1,172 310% 1,387 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 57.1 190% 66.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,303 DQ Write 927 DQ Mixed 1,004 780% 1,078 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 253% Great: 435%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB 18,723 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 166 175 180 181 180 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Read 110 Write 107 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 173 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 32GB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	MC Read 24.2 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 23.9 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 19.9 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	765x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	620x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	597x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	501x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $80Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	380x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	368x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	431x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	268x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	231x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,019

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16