Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	84% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	97.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V LX (all builds)
Memory	7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130228
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '17 at 20:39
Run Duration	402 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 92.8 1-Core 116 2-Core 230 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 584 61% 492 Pts	64-Core 583 36% 583 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.28 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 111 Parallax 93.8 86% 104 fps	MRender 93.3 Gravity 96.7 Splatting 98.1 79% 96.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7927 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 155 (B1) Unknown 99 99 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 55 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 5 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19235511778	97.1% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 398 Mixed 415 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 69.9 4K Mixed 43.2 141% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 80.7 88% 150 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 71GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12722 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 460 (B1) Unknown 97 97 54 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 53 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 5 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17904163373	66.8% Good	Read 267 Write 211 Mixed 218 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 34.3 113% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 81.3 87% 146 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 51GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12344 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 399 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 56 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2581558303	97.5% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 411 Mixed 421 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 68.9 4K Mixed 41 139% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 76.7 89% 155 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230 19,674 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 3.5TB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 86 198227176 (03) Spinup time 93 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1587 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 25923830950 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 20774 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 502 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 14665 (BC) Unknown 100 99 30065229831 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 60 554762271 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 284 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 7373 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 31 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 16 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 16 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -79456894962380 (F1) Unknown 100 253 29736560147 (F2) Unknown 100 253 20835469680	94.7% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 163 Mixed 130 114% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 5.45 4K Mixed 0.55 189% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 94%
Seagate ST_M13FQBL 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1TB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 223720472 (03) Spinup time 96 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 675 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 55 21517862808 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12525 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 462 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 393223 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 60 554762270 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 7 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 74 74 52110 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 73014444062 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -62801011797521 (F1) Unknown 100 253 13903818809 (F2) Unknown 100 253 218859216928	88.2% Excellent	Read 139 Write 168 Mixed 111 104% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 5.41 4K Mixed 0.87 227% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 88%
Seagate FreeAgentDesktop 320GB 293 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 297GB free, PID 3000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 24.5 Mixed 26.6 34% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.39 62% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 17%
Generic Mass-Storage 8GB 1,181 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID null Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	8.01% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 11.8 Mixed 10.6 15% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.59 4K Write 0.69 4K Mixed 0.58 60% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 8.01% Great: 10%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 64GB-$11 1,208 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 7GB free, PID 0243 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 14.5 Mixed 20.2 26% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.55 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.6 79% 2.12 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-558.A00LF 2x8GB 774 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 16 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 16.1 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,406x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,167x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	1,072x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	375x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	366x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	302x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	214x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	196x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	149x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	138x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	131x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	105x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16