| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus F1A75-V EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110712 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 29 '22 at 20:33 |
| Run Duration | 327 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 64% |
PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
34.5%
Below average
|
34% 55.1 Pts
|
17% 129 Pts
|
8% 124 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8561) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.1%
Below average
|
34% 42.6 fps
|
31% 37.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU630 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: N191129a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 35 34 25 40 42 MB/s
|
8.75%
Terrible
|
22% 95.5 MB/s
|
11% 3.27 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 28 28 14 28 32 MB/s
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
27% 37.1 MB/s
|
101% 0.57 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
356GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 106 118 116 116 119 MB/s
|
61.9%
Good
|
71% 97 MB/s
|
134% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
31.3%
Below average
|
34% 11.9 GB/s
|
16% 5.67 GB/s
|
23% 172 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical F1A75-V EVO Builds (Compare 20 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples | 12x |
| A6-3500 APUAMD $60Bench 39%, 2,804 samples | 4x |
| Athlon II X4 641AMDBench 48%, 1,109 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples | 6x |
| Radeon HD 3800ATIBench 5%, 3,400 samples | 3x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $226 |