Radiant 1671-1672

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	63.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

21 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	Radiant 1671-1672 (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140318
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '22 at 13:37
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3550S 766 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 91 2-Core 163 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 323 43% 322 Pts	64-Core 302 19% 302 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% MSI(1462 C411) CLim: 1565 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.8.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Lighting 83.1 Reflection 69.5 Parallax 107 68% 86.5 fps	MRender 69.7 Gravity 87.3 Splatting 53.2 56% 70.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SQF-S25M4-120G-9IG 120GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FMA028 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 28 31 36 36 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 385 Write 64.8 Mixed 136 SusWrite 34 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 9.6 68% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 26.3 DQ Mixed 9.8 25% 55.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$75 15,105 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 196GB free Firmware: CC3C SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 112 109 114 112 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 86.7 Write 84 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 112 62% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 129% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 75%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 196GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 16 17 16 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.6% Terrible	Read 10.7 Write 13.7 Mixed 13.4 SusWrite 15.7 10% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 7.6% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 85F7 F6456U64F1600G 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.7% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 14.9 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 14.6 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 1671-1672 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Radiant 1671-1672

CPU
Core i3-3220Intel $60Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	15x
Core i5-3550SIntelBench 71%, 766 samples	15x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	10x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	14x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	6x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	4x

SSD
MK0800GCTZB 800GBBench 88%, 80 samples	6x
SQF-S25M4-120G-9IG 120GBBench 48%, 17 samples	5x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	4x

RAM
F6456U66F1600G 4x2GBUnknownBench 53%, 16 samples	16x
F6456U64F1600G 2x2GBUnknownBench 52%, 21 samples	3x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 47%, 628 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16