Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266 8,235 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 85.2 2-Core 154 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 308 38% 290 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 78%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PH6-CE480-L 480GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 278GB free (System drive) Firmware: F/W:1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 150 318 357 218 241 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 31.7 Write 347 Mixed 330 SusWrite 233 54% 235 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 25.5 84% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 27.1 90% 200 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 104%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB 3,232 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 754GB free Firmware: SDM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 27 28 28 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 26.1 Write 26.7 Mixed 25.6 SusWrite 26.8 20% 26.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.7 175% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	49.5% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16.5 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.7 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	41x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	34x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $624

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16