Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150811
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '17 at 09:04
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 98 2-Core 191 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 372 50% 373 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Lighting 34.8 Reflection 25.9 Parallax 31.4 28% 30.7 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 32.5 Splatting 32 28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR050 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 182 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 148 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 24 (AE) Unknown 100 100 22 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 74 55 193274773530 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 7372747935 (F7) Unknown 100 100 231020154 (F8) Unknown 100 100 92675387 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1259 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	63.9% Good	Read 465 Write 274 Mixed 306 77% 348 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 10.2 83% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 21.5 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 10 38% 77.4 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 95%
Seagate ST3120827AS 120GB-$38 1,818 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 11GB free Firmware: 3.42 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 59 46 207983847 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2844 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 6 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 13827210653 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 28026 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1536 (C2) HDA temperature 30 52 42949672990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 59 46 207983847 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 3 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	21.6% Poor	Read 37.4 Write 37.7 Mixed 35.2 28% 36.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 0.87 4K Mixed 0.34 78% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 32%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$48 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 7GB free Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 93 92411325 (03) Spinup time 99 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2647 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 319450482 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13492 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1543 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 47 555417633 (C2) HDA temperature 33 53 73014444065 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 86 69 14510645 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	28.7% Poor	Read 49.8 Write 49.8 Mixed 48.7 37% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.39 97% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905584-029.A00LF 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 17.8 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H81M-S2H Builds (Compare 1,590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	447x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	337x
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	123x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	235x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	144x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	118x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	77x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	51x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	41x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	53x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	38x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16