Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-1005G1 22,960 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Memory 59.4 1-Core 92.7 2-Core 162 59% 105 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 225 30% 225 Pts	64-Core 233 14% 233 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Clevo(1558 8680) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	4.92% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 0.2 5% 3.57 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 9.2 4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.92% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD_M.2_256GB_InnovationIT 256GB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0929A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 52 5.7 203 56 6.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 416 Write 208 Mixed 350 SusWrite 84.2 59% 265 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 9.1 4K Mixed 1.3 33% 9.37 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 46.3 85% 165 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GB 34,565 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.6% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 9.5 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 9.1 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	3x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	3x

SSD
SSD_M.2_256GB_InnovationIT 256GBBench 71%, 127 samples	2x
MZNLH256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 51 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16