HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '23 at 03:40
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 148
50% 86.4 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 249
30% 234 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 3396) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74
589GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 180 236 236 244 263 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 336
Write 234
Mixed 156
SusWrite 225
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 18.3
62% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 140
122% 185 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 125%
ST6000NM 0044 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.2% Very poor
Read 104
Write 5.2
Mixed 17.1
SusWrite 1.7
27% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
54% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 63%
WDC WD50 00AACS-61M6B2 500GB
259GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 65 65 65 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.4% Poor
Read 64.8
Write 65.4
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 64.6
83% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 30%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00RKKA0 1TB
90GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 35 36 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 50.4
Write 35.1
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 35.3
49% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
68% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 23%
ST310004 24CS 1TB
421GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 88 88 88 90 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.4% Below average
Read 50.4
Write 65.9
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 87
86% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 32%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
253GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 63 66 69 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 100
Write 98
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 69.5
105% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.1
42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 59%
ST350041 4CS 500GB
198GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.3 5.1 5.2 5.5 5.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.15% Terrible
Read 50.1
Write 12.4
Mixed 12
SusWrite 5.3
20% 20 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 18%
ST350041 4CS 500GB
222GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.5 5.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.12% Terrible
Read 49.9
Write 12.7
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 5.3
20% 20 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.12%
Great: 39%
ST350041 4CS 500GB
27GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.08% Terrible
Read 49.9
Write 12.4
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 5.3
20% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.08%
Great: 14%
ST350041 4CS 500GB
79GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.3 3.8 3.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 9% Great: 39%
ST350031 2CS 500GB
27GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.3 5.1 5.2 5.5 5.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.86% Terrible
Read 49.7
Write 12.7
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 5.3
20% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.86%
Great: 42%
USB 3.0 super high speed 320GB
103GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.5 2.8 2.2 2.5 3.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 34%
OOS6000G 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 2 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.2% Very poor
Read 55.6
Write 19.6
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 1.9
26% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2.7
118% 3.27 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11.3
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback