Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 96.8 2-Core 193 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 498 55% 436 Pts	64-Core 501 31% 501 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Lighting 15.8 Reflection 14.4 Parallax 18.4 13% 16.2 fps	MRender 21.4 Gravity 14.2 Splatting 16.8 14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G1G0A- 240GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1000 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 295 Write 100 Mixed 172 41% 189 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 25.5 4K Mixed 2.63 41% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 20.4 DQ Write 21.9 DQ Mixed 3.33 7% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GB 1,049 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 39.9 MC Mixed 35.2 105% 36.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.4 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	74x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16