MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory51.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 23:27
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$189
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 74.3
1-Core 164
2-Core 334
100% 191 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 1,029
101% 825 Pts
64-Core 1,503
93% 1,503 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1242 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.5% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 57.1
Parallax 77.9
50% 65.3 fps
MRender 56.2
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 42.7
44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1408 881 851 875 810 888 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,871
Write 2,010
Mixed 1,520
SusWrite 952
357% 1,588 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 58.3
184% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 792
DQ Write 574
DQ Mixed 719
528% 695 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 221%
Great: 347%
Crucial_CT1050MX 1TB
303GB free
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 416 378 353 357 352 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 256
Write 362
Mixed 288
SusWrite 376
73% 320 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 10.9
36% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 110
107% 164 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 106 96 105 105 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 128
Write 137
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 101
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 101%
Amd-raid Array 1 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 144 137 139 139 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 142
Write 134
Mixed 126
SusWrite 139
100% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.2
127% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 116%
Amd-raid Array 3 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 58 66 63 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 35.1
Write 103
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 61.5
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/16G F4-3200C16-16GVK KHX2400C15/16G F4-3200C16-16GVK 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.7% Good
MC Read 29
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 26.7
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,517 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $901
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback