PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 90.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1 (all builds) |
Memory | 17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110328 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 12 '23 at 20:58 |
Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 64% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
90.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 198 229 238 243 242 MB/s
|
62.5%
Good
|
|||
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 64GB
28GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
||||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
57GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 11 10 8.7 10 9.9 MB/s
|
12.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CMX16GX3M2A1600C11 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX16GX3M2A1600C11 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
|
48.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 160x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 152x |
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 43x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 40x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 36x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $516 |