Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-3800 APU 1,245 User benchmarks, average bench 26% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Memory 14 1-Core 13.7 2-Core 26.8 11% 18.2 Pts	4-Core 52.4 8-Core 17.4 6% 34.9 Pts	64-Core 37.6 2% 37.6 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8280 1,831 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 148D) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 2.1 1% 2.17 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03200001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 40 49 46 49 51 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.5% Poor	Read 156 Write 45.5 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 47.2 19% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 14.6 29% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 58.7 DQ Mixed 47.6 49% 81.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Micron 8JTF5126 4HZ-1GD 1 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 5.3 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.9 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 368 11% 368 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 17%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

RAM
HMT425S6AFR6A-PB Elpida EDJ4208EFBG-GNL-F 6GBHynixBench 15%, 71 samples	3x
EDJ4208EFBG-GNL-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 20%, 348 samples	3x
HMT451S6AFR8A-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 14%, 73 samples	2x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16