Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170424
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 07 '17 at 15:40
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 224
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 671
67% 548 Pts
64-Core 630
39% 630 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.43
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 32.3
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 30.2
26% 33.5 fps
MRender 46.8
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 42.5
33% 40.6 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300. 960GB
322GB free
Firmware: 12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 488
Write 271
Mixed 278
76% 346 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 7.64
68% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 32.3
79% 169 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 103%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,690
Write 1,209
Mixed 1,365
385% 1,755 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 22
158% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 399
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 139
168% 296 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 243%
Great: 236%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
83GB free
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 414
Mixed 390
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 31.5
114% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 122
140% 238 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94%
Great: 106%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
1TB free
Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 149
Mixed 170
123% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.21
102% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 112%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
997GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 80.3
Write 82.8
Mixed 59.1
94% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.21
71% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.5% Very good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 18.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $960
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback