ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 4377A5G

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 4377A5G (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 4377A5G
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120904
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '17 at 18:26
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	AZE-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 84.4 1-Core 83.4 2-Core 158 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 201 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 197 12% 197 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 5002) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 5.35 Parallax 2.78 3% 4.06 fps	MRender 5.19 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.7 4% 5.04 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB 4,026 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 49 45 51 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 153560110	78.6% Very good	Read 513 Write 414 Mixed 412 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 18 99% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 31.7 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 17.8 33% 62.3 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 118%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 225GB free Firmware: 2AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 974 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 89 89 3454 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2965 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9975 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 605 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2972 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 152 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 44 249108955178 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 17584 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 605 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 20942	49.9% Average	Read 87.1 Write 86.8 Mixed 83 64% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.32 82% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 0443 RMT3160ED58E9W1600 8GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	57.8% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 18.5 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.1 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback