Gigabyte GA-B650M GAMING X AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 202%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 197%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650M GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '23 at 01:26
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$196
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 212
2-Core 416
122% 236 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 1,127
111% 906 Pts
64-Core 1,397
86% 1,397 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 104%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 6901) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
197% Outstanding
Lighting 246
Reflection 251
Parallax 534
201% 344 fps
MRender 407
Gravity 211
Splatting 334
260% 317 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 197%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3512GNTD 512GB
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM00.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1084 610 282 292 292 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,109
Write 1,079
Mixed 882
SusWrite 475
199% 886 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 36.6
149% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 512
DQ Write 91.4
DQ Mixed 158
153% 254 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 132%
Great: 239%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
448GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1087 537 471 471 473 472 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,538
Write 1,547
Mixed 1,124
SusWrite 585
268% 1,199 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 101
344% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,067
DQ Write 1,204
DQ Mixed 434
521% 902 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 255%
Great: 311%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 272 272 272 272 342 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 334
Write 270
Mixed 256
SusWrite 299
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 43.5
177% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 144
127% 196 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 187 189 195 193 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 66.5
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 192
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G48C40U5T.M4A1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
145% Outstanding
MC Read 55.6
MC Write 47.3
MC Mixed 51
147% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 52.2
SC Write 61
SC Mixed 49.6
155% 54.3 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 145%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B650M GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 257%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650M GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,076
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback