MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics6.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJul 09 '23 at 13:08
Run Duration514 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Memory 7.81
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 78.5
21% 43 Pts
4-Core 74.6
8-Core 159
14% 117 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C51) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 12.2
7% 9.63 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 9.4
Splatting 8.3
6% 7.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD_2.5"_TLC_512GB_InnovationIT 512GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 74 71 142 188 6.9 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.2% Poor
Read 265
Write 223
Mixed 238
SusWrite 82.7
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 0.8
22% 7.07 MB/s
DQ Read 99.1
DQ Write 18.1
DQ Mixed 0.9
16% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 94%
Intenso SCSI 5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 21 21 21 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 80.4
Write 76.7
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 20.7
42% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 69%
Seagate M3 Portable 3TB
893GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 31 32 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 70.4
Write 58.7
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 32.4
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.3
123% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 57%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
401GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 31 33 34 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 94.2
Write 103
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 33.2
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
125% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 65%
Asmt 2105 5TB
609GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.12% Terrible
Read 16
Write 26
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 11.6
14% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.5
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.12%
Great: 94%
Seagate Portable 5TB
762GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 87.2
Write 114
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 21.2
53% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 67%
WD My Passport 25E1 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 33 35 35 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 85.7
Write 81.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 34.8
82% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
166% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 65%
Generic External 1TB
293GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.98% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 25.1
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 10.8
27% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
47% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.98%
Great: 25%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
596GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 30 33 32 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 70.4
Write 83.5
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 32.4
72% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 49%
WL3000GS A6472B 3TB
318GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.06% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 27.1
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 10.9
29% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
66% 1.33 MB/s
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
361GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 30 33 32 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 73.4
Write 52.2
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 32.1
64% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 45%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB
380GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 30 32 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 68.4
Write 72.6
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 32.3
59% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown INNO8G2400S 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2.5
6% 2.13 GB/s
Latency 425
9% 425 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $310
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback