Lenovo 82N9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82N9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 14:43
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 3015e Graphics
FT5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Memory 34.8
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 82.8
32% 56 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 111
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3812) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.46.14
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.6
1% 2.3 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 2
Splatting 4
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFM256GD3HX015N 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41040C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 443 442 449 392 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 508
Write 449
Mixed 488
SusWrite 425
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 24.4
82% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 121
92% 125 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 272%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.8% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 51 0 14" 1280 720 BOE08E3
Typical 82N9 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82N9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback