Corsair VENGEANCE i7300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 165%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive370% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCorsair VENGEANCE i7300  (all builds)
MotherboardASUS PRIME B660-PLUS D4
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220916
Uptime21 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 04:38
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$170
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 183
2-Core 369
111% 212 Pts
4-Core 739
8-Core 1,224
120% 982 Pts
64-Core 1,668
103% 1,668 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 110%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 209
Parallax 200
178% 209 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 151
Splatting 135
129% 161 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00A00 1TB
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7601Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2388 1761 1794 1802 1813 1847 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
370% Outstanding
Read 2,523
Write 2,843
Mixed 2,378
SusWrite 1901
544% 2,412 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 96
308% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,446
DQ Write 1,087
DQ Mixed 1,248
938% 1,260 MB/s
Poor: 252%
This bench: 370%
Great: 492%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
191GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2197 2116 2116 2123 2116 2119 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
370% Outstanding
Read 2,246
Write 2,861
Mixed 2,602
SusWrite 2,131
557% 2,460 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 90.5
293% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,513
DQ Write 1,136
DQ Mixed 1,287
972% 1,312 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 370%
Great: 477%
MSI M390 1TB
479GB free
Firmware: EHFM31.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1289 1387 1380 1392 1473 1196 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,056
Write 1,273
Mixed 846
SusWrite 1,353
256% 1,132 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 63.8
243% 93.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1363
DQ Write 1127
DQ Mixed 1,224
922% 1,238 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 254%
Great: 362%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
894GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 135 137 142 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 81.9
Write 145
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 135
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMWS8GL3200K16W4E 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 36
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 38.4
SC Mixed 28.6
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 65: 0P 5R 10G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 17% 53 179 13 144 31.5" 1920 1080 AOC3201 32G1WG4
History: Score 35: 0P 5R 3G 1B | Score 65: 0P 5R 10G 10B
Typical VENGEANCE i7300 Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

System: Corsair VENGEANCE i7300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,094
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback