Powerspec G213

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive22.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemPowerspec G213  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DX79SI
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 00:24
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 42.5
2-Core 100
42% 68.6 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 393
35% 298 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Zotac(19DA 1190) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-1T 1TB
732GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 49 40 51 26 31 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.1% Poor
Read 202
Write 72.7
Mixed 126
SusWrite 37.7
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 4.7
20% 6.7 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 65.7
DQ Mixed 92.6
78% 118 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
994GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 152 162 152 157 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 146
Write 146
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 156
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x2020202020202020202020202020202020 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 28.3
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 23 0 49.5" 1280 720 VIZ1039 V505M-K09
Typical G213 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Powerspec G213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback