HP Compaq 8510w

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8510w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30C5
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080205
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '18 at 12:21
Run Duration	335 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9300-$70 3,287 User benchmarks, average bench 38% U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	41% Average	Memory 70.7 1-Core 35.3 2-Core 69.5 40% 58.5 Pts	4-Core 68.2 8-Core 70.8 9% 69.5 Pts	64-Core 71.5 4% 71.5 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 570M 446 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 30C5) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	1.6% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 0.62 2% 1.98 fps	MRender 2.38 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 2.96 2% 2.19 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.6% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T1 250GB 605 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 109GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	8.39% Terrible	Read 34.6 Write 21.8 Mixed 23 6% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.09 4K Write 6.57 4K Mixed 3.82 19% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 8.39% Great: 71%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3586 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 856 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 80 (AE) Unknown 100 100 16 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 51 210454249506 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 8243517724 (F7) Unknown 100 100 260763830 (F8) Unknown 100 100 1079405546	35.1% Below average	Read 173 Write 181 Mixed 177 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 10.6 54% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 14.9 DQ Write 39.7 DQ Mixed 10.7 13% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 97%
Ricoh SD Disk Device 31GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 2GB free Firmware: 01 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	3.21% Terrible	Read 2 Write 8.04 Mixed 3.3 3% 4.45 MB/s	4K Read 3.39 4K Write 0.17 4K Mixed 0.17 163% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.21% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4.1 13% 4.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8510w Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8510w

CPU
Core2 Duo T7500Intel $90Bench 35%, 4,281 samples	6x
Core2 Duo T7700Intel $100Bench 37%, 1,898 samples	2x
Core2 Duo T9500Intel $125Bench 39%, 996 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro FX 570MNvidiaBench 2%, 446 samples	8x
Mobility Radeon HD 2600ATIBench 1%, 487 samples	3x

SSD
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	1x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	1x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	8x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $90

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16