Asus H81M-D R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-D R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150914
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '18 at 16:57
Run Duration	327 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 100 2-Core 198 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 368 49% 368 Pts	64-Core 367 23% 367 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 858E) 2GB CLim: 726 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	3.52% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 3.53 4% 4.41 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 3.22 4% 4.51 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.52% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ESA3ASA2PSTBT120GB 120GB 219 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 191 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 211 (A3) Unknown 100 100 59 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 141 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 616 (F2) Unknown 100 100 708	72.1% Very good	Read 463 Write 294 Mixed 415 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 84.8 4K Mixed 6.95 97% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 2.38 56% 131 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 72%
WD WD2500AVCS-6 250GB 299 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 226GB free Firmware: 1A02 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 192 189 3391 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 653 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 714 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 522 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 350 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 302 (C2) HDA temperature 111 99 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	50.1% Above average	Read 86.9 Write 87.7 Mixed 83.1 65% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.79 4K Mixed 0.22 57% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 52%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 8GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	6.22% Terrible	Read 20.9 Write 5.62 Mixed 9.09 12% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.25 4K Write 0.16 4K Mixed 0.75 54% 2.39 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.22% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 77,652 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 19.8 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 19.8 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 61.4 65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-D R2.0 Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81M-D R2.0

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	114x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	53x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	36x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	23x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	16x
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples	10x
Force LE 120GBCorsairBench 76%, 3,209 samples	9x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 3,931 samples	12x
99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 12,132 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $283

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16