Asus E3 PRO GAMING V5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus E3 PRO GAMING V5  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171212
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateApr 14 '18 at 18:00
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 202
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 600
58% 478 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Gigabyte(1458 22D0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1225 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 78.6
55% 69.6 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 62.9
Splatting 52.9
49% 60.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 474
Write 327
Mixed 314
82% 371 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 20.9
93% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 13
48% 109 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 95%
Intel 535 Series 120GB-$75
28GB free
Firmware: RG21 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 455
Write 161
Mixed 239
62% 285 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 14.2
96% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.7
DQ Write 83.3
DQ Mixed 12.7
22% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 87%
WD WD20NPVX-00EA4T0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 51.4
Write 48.9
Mixed 63.4
42% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 0.35
4K Mixed 0.19
48% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 60%
Marshal MAL33000SA-T72 3TB
821GB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 134
Write 136
Mixed 114
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.56
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.29
137% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
243GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 145
Write 158
Mixed 136
110% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.2
78% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
350GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 125
Write 140
Mixed 111
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.23
84% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate Backup+ Hub WH 8TB
4TB free, PID ab39
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
73% Very good
Read 141
Write 150
Mixed 96.5
164% 129 MB/s
4K Read 4.51
4K Write 6.09
4K Mixed 0.46
240% 3.69 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 73%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL15-15-15 D4-2133 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 23.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 19
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E3 PRO GAMING V5 Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus E3 PRO GAMING V5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $169
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback