Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory43.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 15 '18 at 17:30
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 135
2-Core 268
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 744
76% 615 Pts
64-Core 745
46% 745 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.24
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 93% Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
424GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 359
Mixed 419
94% 425 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 51.5
164% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 132
149% 256 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
388GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 364
Mixed 420
95% 426 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 50.7
165% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 94.7
DQ Mixed 129
111% 170 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
WD Blue SATA M.2 250GB-$89
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 476
Write 316
Mixed 304
81% 365 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 17.4
80% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 46.5
94% 194 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 100%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
217GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 68.7
Write 58.9
Mixed 51
74% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.19
66% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C14D4/16G Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FADG KHX2400C14D4/16G Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FADG 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.3% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 24.5
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,124
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback