Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '18 at 11:28
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4170-$59 48,178 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69% Good	Memory 90 1-Core 104 2-Core 183 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 284 38% 282 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% ASRock(1849 041E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	2.93% Terrible	Lighting 3.03 Reflection 4.77 Parallax 3.72 2% 3.84 fps	MRender 6.14 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 5.43 4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.93% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-00000 256GB 796 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT0100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 734 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1541 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 13 (AE) Unknown 99 99 251 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1843 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 55 31 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 16504585 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2824 (F2) Unknown 99 99 3321 (F9) Unknown 99 99 3328		Read 516 Write 500 Mixed 505 113% 507 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 97.7 4K Mixed 49.7 177% 62.7 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 283 127% 309 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 110%
Lexar CFUDMASD 2GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID b035 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.34% Terrible	Read 19.6 Write 17.1 Mixed 17.8 23% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.07 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 28% 2.38 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.34% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.3% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 17.3 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 18.6 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 67.3 60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,403 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0 - $21

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	190x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	139x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	120x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	125x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	85x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	76x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	64x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	45x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	28x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	25x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16