MSI Z270 CAMO SQUAD (MS-7A68)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A68
MotherboardMSI Z270 CAMO SQUAD (MS-7A68)  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '18 at 18:25
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 84
1-Core 111
2-Core 219
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 648
66% 536 Pts
64-Core 649
40% 649 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.6% Good
Lighting 76.7
Reflection 77.4
Parallax 65.2
62% 73.1 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 69.1
57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
238GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 474
Mixed 499
111% 496 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 42.8
162% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 156
161% 264 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
233GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,194
Write 1,114
Mixed 1,224
332% 1,511 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 43.4
189% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 145
153% 256 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 227%
Great: 236%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
89GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 482
Write 260
Mixed 272
74% 338 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 28.2
126% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 71.9
98% 183 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 114%
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 513
Write 160
Mixed 274
69% 315 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 12.8
111% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 50.4
88% 174 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
807GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 171
Mixed 160
131% 174 MB/s
4K Read 1.27
4K Write 2.61
4K Mixed 0.31
136% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
219GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70% Good
Read 107
Write 136
Mixed 139
97% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.26
91% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 04CD F4-3600C17-8GTZR 04CD F4-3600C17-8GTZR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.5% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.3
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 21.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 CAMO SQUAD (MS-7A68) Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 CAMO SQUAD (MS-7A68)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $503
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback