ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer TravelMate 2700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Acer TravelMate 2700 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer TravelMate 2700
Memory	1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20040930
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 27 '18 at 18:46
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 2.80GHz-$100 1,546 User benchmarks, average bench 28% JP25, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Memory 34.3 1-Core 31.8 2-Core 31.1 22% 32.4 Pts	4-Core 32.3 8-Core 31.7 4% 32 Pts	64-Core 32 2% 32 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 38%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK8032GAX 80GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: AD001A Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1433 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2851 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 1777 (0A) Spinup retry count 156 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1768 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 75 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 69522 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 253403398184 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 8320 (DE) Loaded hours 98 98 1175 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 430 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	15.7% Very poor	Read 27.7 Write 26.8 Mixed 15.7 17% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.25 60% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 16%
ST932032 0AS 320GB 34GB free, PID 8017 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.28% Terrible	Read 19.7 Write 17.2 Mixed 8.62 18% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 0.85 4K Mixed 0.28 40% 0.47 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DRAM Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	6.42% Terrible	MC Read 1.9 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.83 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 1.6 6% 2.07 GB/s	Latency 230 17% 230 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.42% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback