ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 PRO (all builds)
Memory	21.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131224
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '14 at 21:22
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4930K-$88 22,204 User benchmarks, average bench 77% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 124 2-Core 248 84% 186 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 800 78% 642 Pts	64-Core 997 62% 997 Pts
Poor: 67% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% EVGA(3842 0784) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4465 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.3% Below average	Lighting 43.7 Reflection 45.3 Parallax 49.5 36% 46.2 fps	MRender 61 Gravity 46 Splatting 44.5 41% 50.5 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 250GB 822 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 960 Write 506 Mixed 624 154% 697 MB/s	4K Read 46.2 4K Write 90.6 4K Mixed 33.3 161% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 96.7 134% 250 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 265%
CRUCIAL-CT28M225 128GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 53GB free Firmware: 2142 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 7 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 224 1 0 (0C) Power cycle count 68 2 0 (B8) Unknown 79 0 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 0 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 0 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 0 0 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 179 176 13186 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 102 176 13635 (C8) Write error rate 124 74 235 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 208 131 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 217 75 1 (CB) Run out cancel 81 61 1 (CC) Soft ECC correction 0 0 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 136 19 0 (CE) Flying height 1 0 0 (CF) Spin high current 120 0 0 (D0) Spin buzz 4 0 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 100 0 0 (D3) Unknown 0 0 0 (D4) Unknown 0 0 0 (D5) Unknown 0 0 0	36.3% Below average	Read 221 Write 141 Mixed 147 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 10.8 4K Mixed 7.96 60% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 61.2 DQ Write 11.1 DQ Mixed 7.71 13% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 36%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 658GB free Firmware: 0A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 115 111 7250 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2438 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4426 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 347 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 152 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10921 (C2) HDA temperature 120 92 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 48 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	30.3% Below average	Read 52.8 Write 52.6 Mixed 53.5 40% 53 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.33 85% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 51%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75 18,569 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 85GB free Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 181 172 1950 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1028 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7199 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 583 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 375 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 135 135 195753 (C2) HDA temperature 121 91 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	53.1% Above average	Read 95.3 Write 89.6 Mixed 89.2 69% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.24 81% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 53%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	544x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	386x
Core i7-4930KIntel $88Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	98x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	85x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	84x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	45x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	38x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	36x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	33x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	32x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GBKingstonBench 86%, 505 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $881

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback