Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	91.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180418
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '18 at 14:03
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 81.8 1-Core 113 2-Core 223 78% 139 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 697 71% 575 Pts	64-Core 901 56% 901 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 121 Parallax 104 93% 113 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 106 Splatting 110 88% 107 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	195% Outstanding	Read 2,052 Write 1,117 Mixed 1,190 320% 1,453 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 27.9 135% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 86.5 DQ Mixed 54.2 56% 93.9 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 195% Great: 236%
Seagate ST4000VX000-1F4168 4TB 3,084 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: CV13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 149258400 (03) Spinup time 94 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1413 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 25313290 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2354 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 370 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 21475229707 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 53 639631397 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 139 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1417 (C2) HDA temperature 37 47 98784247845 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	93.9% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 154 Mixed 154 121% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.14 70% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 106%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 563GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 190 176 7466 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 739 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6407 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 532 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 220 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 151 151 148080 (C2) HDA temperature 112 102 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	47.2% Average	Read 79 Write 85 Mixed 88.6 64% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.28 102% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 87%
ST1000DM 003-1ER162 1TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 931GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 202 Write 201 Mixed 123 218% 175 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.25 65% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 78%
ST1000DM 003-1ER162 1TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 931GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 197 Write 194 Mixed 177 243% 190 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.25 80% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 78%
OOS500G 500GB 426GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.1% Average	Read 121 Write 106 Mixed 76.5 124% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.41 76% 0.97 MB/s

TOSHIBA- TR150 120GB 112GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	218% Outstanding	Read 364 Write 374 Mixed 344 465% 361 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 25.8 4K Mixed 9.97 1,283% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 19.3 DQ Write 37.3 DQ Mixed 10.7 1,702% 22.4 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x8GB 17,846 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 42.4 MC Write 39.5 MC Mixed 34.3 111% 38.7 GB/s	SC Read 24.4 SC Write 36 SC Mixed 28.1 84% 29.5 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $92Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $47	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)