Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

Motherboard	Parallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8.00001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180524
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '18 at 10:04
Run Duration	70 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,371 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Memory 20.6 1-Core 42.5 2-Core 116 30% 59.6 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 115 15% 110 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 66%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
harddisk 268GB 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: F.T64EH4 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 232GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 8192, 32769, 32769, 32769, 32769, 32769, 32769, 32769 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 6.07 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 2.6 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 316 13% 316 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16