Asus P7H57D-V EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H57D-V EVO (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20100813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '18 at 19:42
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 95.7 1-Core 68.6 2-Core 143 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 282 36% 270 Pts	64-Core 279 17% 279 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450 15,395 User benchmarks, average bench 23% EVGA(3842 1595) 3GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1053 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 22% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 113 107 106 124 130 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.2% Below average	Read 253 Write 116 Mixed 121 SusWrite 117 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 15.6 57% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 14.6 DQ Write 45 DQ Mixed 15 16% 24.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 349GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 134 123 121 127 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 153 Write 142 Mixed 76 SusWrite 129 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 222% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 274GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 102 100 102 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 136 Write 91.3 Mixed 68 SusWrite 102 73% 99.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	48.9% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 17.4 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 11.9 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 55.1 73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H57D-V EVO Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H57D-V EVO

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	37x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	32x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	30x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	9x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	8x
BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA500CM10003 500GBSeagateBench 117%, 6,074 samples	8x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	49x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	42x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $310

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16