HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Z800 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory	21.7 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100913
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '16 at 16:55
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670 4,676 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 79 2-Core 158 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 632 56% 474 Pts	64-Core 1,172 72% 1,172 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 1972) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5921 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Lighting 67.6 Reflection 70.2 Parallax 61 55% 66.3 fps	MRender 72.9 Gravity 63.3 Splatting 55.1 51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512MAY-1A 512GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: M504 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	80% Very good	Read 353 Write 406 Mixed 390 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 60.9 4K Mixed 25.8 104% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 64.4 89% 165 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 7.5TB free Firmware: MX4O Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 7.5TB free Firmware: MX4O Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 7.5TB free Firmware: MX4O Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 7.5TB free Firmware: MX4O Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 7,666 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 5.5TB free Firmware: JKAO Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 98 (03) Spinup time 123 123 51577291349 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 873 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 119 36 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 30766 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 78 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1355 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1355 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 227634511904 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 7
Poor: 35% Great: 70%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 7,666 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 5.5TB free Firmware: JKAO Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 98 (03) Spinup time 122 122 51577750108 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 873 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 35 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 30766 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 78 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1361 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1361 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 231929413664 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5
Poor: 35% Great: 70%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 7,666 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 5.5TB free Firmware: JKAO Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 98 (03) Spinup time 122 122 51577619034 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 873 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 9 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 119 36 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 30765 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 78 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1367 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1367 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 240519413795 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 9 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3
Poor: 35% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K1 ID:80 2C 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K1 ID:80 2C 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K1 ID:80 2C 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K1 ID:80 2C 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K1 ID:80 2C 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K1 58GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.8% Good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 27 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	161x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	88x
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples	67x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16