Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '18 at 20:24
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 94.9
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 164
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 500
49% 401 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 839E) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1126 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 444 451 455 455 453 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 454
Mixed 353
SusWrite 449
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 50.8
172% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 254
194% 262 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 112%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
390GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 103 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 115
Write 98
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 103
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$9
11GB free, PID 5583
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 17 9.9 9.7 9.7 9.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 91
Write 27.3
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 13.9
45% 41.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.6
230% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 31%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 7.3 8.1 8.7 8.3 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Read 30.7
Write 25.5
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 8.4
22% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 18.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 15.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $689
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback