Asrock X99M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '16 at 08:08
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 217
84% 145 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 721
76% 606 Pts
64-Core 947
59% 947 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6451
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 19.5
Parallax 22.1
20% 22.1 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 19.1
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 406
Mixed 417
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 35.1
133% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 110
129% 224 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98%
Great: 134%
WL6000GSA6472E 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01C01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
103% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 178
Mixed 166
132% 175 MB/s
4K Read 1.11
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.19
98% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
WL6000GSA6472E 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01D.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 170
Mixed 159
122% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.16
4K Write 2.82
4K Mixed 0.23
126% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 94%
Great: 94%
WL6000GSA6472E 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01D.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 179
Mixed 156
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.76
4K Mixed 0.25
129% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 94%
WL6000GSA6472E 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01D.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 163
Mixed 161
123% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.79
4K Mixed 0.26
127% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 94%
TOSHIBA TransMemory-Mx 32GB
29GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 66.4
Write 14.6
Mixed 19.2
33% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.83
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.58
82% 2.84 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 24
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 21.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $518
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback