HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farger, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '18 at 18:04
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 105 2-Core 207 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 479 53% 420 Pts	64-Core 516 32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1950 Pro 144 User benchmarks, average bench 1% PowerColor(148C 2231) 512MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.61% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 1.81 Parallax 1.72 2% 2.18 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.61% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 500GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 384GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 9.5 12 11 9.8 8.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 8 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 9.7 11% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 135%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB 17,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 180GB free Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 106 111 111 110 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 118 Write 89.5 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 109 70% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 76%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$49 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 74GB free Firmware: 4.AAB SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 70 71 71 71 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	41% Average	Read 71.8 Write 71.5 Mixed 44.5 SusWrite 70.7 48% 64.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 4x4GB 423 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.6% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 14.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 11 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,041x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	967x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	401x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	381x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	336x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	120x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	42x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	48x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16