Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S5  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2709
Memory30 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20091002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '18 at 02:43
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5520
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 79.5
52% 75 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 454
36% 317 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MegaRAID SAS RMB 146GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 121 112 123 128 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 118
Mixed 179
SusWrite 124
173% 235 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 8.6
3,400% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 189%
Great: 189%
LSI MegaRAID SAS RMB 439GB
409GB free
Firmware: 1.40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 35 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 36.3
Mixed 148
SusWrite 36.2
132% 178 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 14.3
4,095% 26.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 158%
Great: 163%
STEC USB 2.0 2GB
0GB free, PID 0001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.5
Write 16.8
Mixed 11.8
22% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 18 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback