Asrock 880GMH/USB3.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock 880GMH/USB3.  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100805
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '18 at 11:46
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 93.5
45% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 180
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
MSI(1462 2400) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 15.3
15% 15.8 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 18
12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AAKB-00H8A0 500GB
351GB free
Firmware: 05.04E05 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 72
Write 86.2
Mixed 28.4
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.41
102% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 46%
WD WD800ABJS-23TEA0 80GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 37.2
Write 46.2
Mixed 20.5
26% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 0.31
4K Mixed 0.02
13% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 30%
STEC USB 2.0 2GB
1GB free, PID 0001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
9.22% Terrible
Read 27.9
Write 16.2
Mixed 18.8
25% 21 MB/s
4K Read 6.41
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.04
27% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.22%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.7% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 880GMH/USB3. Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880GMH/USB3.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback