Today's hottest deals

Supermicro C9X299-PGF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemSupermicro C9X299-PGF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C9X299-PGF
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '18 at 16:55
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$204
CPU, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 128
2-Core 251
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 802
77% 636 Pts
64-Core 1,039
64% 1,039 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KB240G7 240GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0142
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 324
Write 126
Mixed 248
51% 233 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 19.6
88% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 163
125% 167 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 69%
Intel SSDSC2KB240G7 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: 0142
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 321
Write 101
Mixed 226
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 23.7
102% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 139
106% 141 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
112GB free
Firmware: 1D05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 105
Write 49.4
Mixed 101
65% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FBD 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.9% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 16.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 10.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C9X299-PGF Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro C9X299-PGF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback