Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '22 at 16:04
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$204
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 58.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 234
74% 138 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 716
69% 568 Pts
64-Core 923
57% 923 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
Nvidia(10DE 13AA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 154
Parallax 154
128% 155 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 135
Splatting 118
117% 148 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 120%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$50
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 195 185 159 144 154 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.9% Below average
Read 157
Write 147
Mixed 139
SusWrite 172
35% 154 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 1.2
32% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 169
138% 199 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 105%
SSD 120GB
16GB free
Firmware: SBFM91.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 393
Write 400
Mixed 339
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 31.2
127% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 192
181% 279 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
77GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 93 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 92.1
Write 94.8
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 94.6
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
25GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 2.2 5.2 6.3 6.3 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
5.77% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 10.4
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 5.4
15% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.77%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 57
MC Mixed 26.3
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 9.7
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $539
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback