| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Z200 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B40h |
| Memory | 6.3 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100506 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 16 '18 at 17:18 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51.4%
Above average
|
60% 105 Pts
|
28% 205 Pts
|
13% 206 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
HP(103C 170B) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622
|
0.89%
Terrible
|
1% 1.04 fps
|
1% 1.33 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28%
Poor
|
28% 9.63 GB/s
|
21% 7.37 GB/s
|
37% 107 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z200 Workstation Builds (Compare 240 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z200 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 58x |
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 37x |
| Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 29x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 19x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| 860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 11x |
| 860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 10x |
| A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $152 |