Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 18 '18 at 00:41
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 255
91% 161 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 696
70% 571 Pts
64-Core 715
44% 715 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1328 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.2% Average
Lighting 56.4
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 82.7
46% 69.9 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 55.2
Splatting 57.4
50% 61 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 742 673 677 666 670 635 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,317
Write 976
Mixed 643
SusWrite 677
201% 903 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 47.5
167% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 404
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 368
271% 358 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 161%
Great: 243%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 360GB
70GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 35 35 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 314
Write 24.1
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 35.9
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 100%
Great: 204%
Seagate ST1000DM TS0100MD00-3C11 1TB
687GB free
Firmware: CC94
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 188 185 185 188 189 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
109% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 129
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 186
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
MMC Card 16GB
12GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 16 15 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
6.9% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 12.8
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 14.9
16% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.9%
Great: 13%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
5GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.9 5.4 4.8 3 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Read 26.9
Write 9
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.6
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 6%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 3.4 3.6 3.3 3.6 3.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 18.9
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 4.5
20% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2176 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 25.7
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 25.6
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 2,976 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback